I only caught a glimpse of the
couple as I entered the garden. I followed the path around the lawn, past the
pergola that gave shade to the bench below. The pair were in a corner, almost
hidden in foliage. As I approached, I felt I was intruding on an intense
conversation between lovers that had fallen silent at that very moment. Had
they declared their love? Had they quarrelled? What had she asked of him? Had he
answered? I tried to interpret their expressions, to imagine their thoughts. I
wanted to hear them speak, however, the silence continued. But then why would
five feet of inanimate concrete have words for me?
They’d been lovingly placed there
when the garden was young; so many years ago that bright yellow lichen now
adorned his jacket. The quiet presence of this piece of statuary enhanced the
garden, perhaps evoking pleasant memories in the one who tended it throughout
the seasons. For me, a casual visitor to this garden near Portsmouth, England on
a sunny day in 2005, it caused me to pause and to ponder, just one of the
reasons artwork is created.
It was a little disconcerting to see
the face peering from the foliage at the foot of the garden, the late afternoon
sun casting shadows, further obscuring the figure. It wasn’t that I was
startled; I’d been forewarned on entering the garden to look out for Leila.
She’d be waiting beyond the rose garden, near the stand of Japanese Silver
Grass. I said hello Leila, not expecting a response. I mean, why would five
feet of inanimate concrete graced by a soft patina of pale green lichen have words
for me.
But then she didn’t need to speak.
Her silent presence enhanced the peacefulness of the garden; she was a part of
the garden, part of the family, at home where she stood. She’d been placed
there some years previously, when the garden was young. At the time she stood
alone in a corner of a lawn. As the garden grew, evolved, shrubs and trees took
their place, and Leila, no longer standing alone in a bare expanse of manicured
green became one with nature, as I discovered her.
Artworks in the form of statuary and
sculptures have long been used to elevate the sometimes prosaic nature of
gardens since the earliest times. The ancient Greeks and the Romans had their peristyle
courts; enclosed gardens where classical sculptures would be displayed,
typically reflecting philosophical or religious motifs and set on pedestals to
be gazed at in awe.
It was during the Italian
Renaissance in the fourteenth century when gardens became larger, symmetrical, and
besides the grottos and fountains, there was always classical statuary. The Italianate
style found its way to Britain, particularly during the nineteenth century when
travelers returning from a
Grand Tour of Europe developed their own Renaissance
gardens and filled them with statuary.
Travel the great gardens of Britain
today, those built long ago by the aristocracy or early industrialists, and it’s
soon apparent statuary was big business in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
Materials were still the traditional marble, stone, or bronze, but in far
greater numbers — every garden owner of note wanted to enhance their estate.
The need was filled by using composite
materials, though often of inferior quality — a crumbling David would be
unlikely to inspire or impress anyone. This was resolved around 1770, when enterprising
Eleanor Coade invented Coade stone, an artificial material used for moulding neoclassical
statues and garden ornaments. Of such high quality and virtually impervious to
the eroding effect of weather, it outperformed natural stone. By the 1840s artificial
stone produced using Portland cement came on the market and the more expensive Coade
stone was largely phased out.
Lost over time, the original secret
recipe, a form of ceramic using crushed flint, fine quartz, and crushed glass was
rediscovered and further refined by sculptor and stone carver Stephen Pettifer.
In 2000 he founded the Coade Company in London, England, which continues to
produce all forms of statuary.
In those great gardens, even now,
two centuries later, what may appear to be an original piece carved from stone
could well be Coade stone.
By the start of the twentieth century
the popularity of classical sculpture waned somewhat with the advent of modern
sculpture, beginning with the work of Auguste Rodin, who exhibited at the Universal
Exhibition held in Paris in 1900. Since then, every form of abstract artistic
expression has made an appearance, in galleries and as public installations, in
gardens as originals or more often replicas, and produced now in every possible
medium.
Just as the Greeks and Romans
created places to display their sculptures, today, parks are created
specifically to display sculptural works, or they are exhibited in existing
gardens. Somehow, the placing of sculptures in a natural setting enhances the moment,
and is a way of introducing such works to the public. Cambridge has its delightful
Sculpture Garden located on Grand avenue South alongside the Grand River. At
the Homer Watson Gallery in Kitchener, there are whimsical works by local
artist, Glen Smith on display in the small garden there.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8223c/8223c1a17ee2e479bd294a60b9da1e5b13984255" alt=""
The Seattle based revolutionary
blown glass artist Dale Chilhuly exhibits his work in gardens around the world
with multicolored pieces that can be mistaken for plants and trees of the
natural world. At Kew Gardens in London, his work was once exhibited both in the
gardens and inside the majestic palm house because, as he said, he always
wanted to show his glasswork in a glasshouse. His pieces have also appeared at
the Desert Botanical Garden in Phoenix, Arizona. While visiting, I could easily
have mistaken his spiky, chartreus cactus for a rare saguaro if it hadn’t been sparkling
so in the bright desert light.
I’d much rather wander a park or
garden than a gallery or museum, and it was first in those large stately
gardens of Britain where classical statuary abounds that I first discovered my
love of sculpture. Renishaw Hall in the north of England is typical of the
nineteenth century style with its stunning Italianate gardens. Statuary there
graces the pathways, at flights of steps, between garden rooms and within them,
where they stand in the shade of topiary hedges five meters high. Sometimes the
topiary works are sculptures in their own right.
Likewise in the south of England at
Hever Castle, the childhood home of Anne Boleyn, the American millionaire and
philanthropist William Waldorf Astor, beginning in 1906 added a magnificent
Italian garden and filled it with his own collection of statuary retrieved
during his European travels.
More a park than a garden, the
Yorkshire Sculpture Park was developed specifically for the display of
sculpture, including a number of Henry Moore pieces. Not sure how Henry would
feel about sheep wandering around his work, although it honours his commitment
to having his work placed in the open air.
It was in a more formal part of the
park that I discovered the 'Moon’, a piece I’d perhaps unfairly describe asa large
scale version of a Victorian gazing ball. Hand-blown glass garden accents were first
recorded as being produced in Venice 13th century. In the 16th century the English
philosopher
Francis Bacon commented
that a proper garden would have round coloured balls for the sun to play upon,
and by the Victorian era they became a popular garden feature, and are still. They
are intriguing, the way they reflect and shimmer as the light changes, but I’m
happy to gaze at them in someone else’s garden.
The ‘Moon’, however, by Swiss artist
Not Vital (a confusing name in English) is something I’d covet if my garden were
large enough to house it. ‘Moon’ is a highly polished sphere in stainless steel
replete with tidy, random dimples representing, I suppose, the more ragged
craters of the moon.
Three meters in diameter, it sits in
an expanse of grass, and like the real moon’s gravitational field, it draws viewers
to touch, to marvel, to observe the distorted reflections of the tree filled
park. It now has its own Saturn like ring, formed by the circling footsteps of
a captivated audience.
One of the finest, though fleeting,
exhibitions of garden art is to be found at the Chelsea Flower Show held
annually in London, England. It’s here where designers compete for gold medals
in garden design. The gardens are imaginative wonders, works of art in their
own right, and typical contain sculptural pieces to complement and enhance the
experience.
At the 2016 show, a garden by
Russian designer Tatyana Goltsova explored the complex relationships between
Russia, Ukraine and the UK, though not in the current political sense. A work
by Ukrainian sculptor Victoria Chichinadze that embodied the spirit of the
traditional lace makers of Eastern Europe was allowed to beautifully dominate
the garden. Crafted from 600kg of aluminum, the white, lace-like form, in sharp
contrast with the surrounding green, swirled through the garden to skim the
surface of a water feature called River of Time, culminating at a transcendent female
figure.
Also at the 2016 show, a gold medal
winning garden by Chris Beardshaw prominently featured a haunting, contemplative
face. Named The Fallen Deodar, it was one of a limited edition of six in verdigris
bronze. At 1.5 meters across, the original was carved from, and inspired by, a
massive Deodar tree (Cedrus deodara) that had fallen on bleak Dartmoor, not far
from the home in Devon of artist Jilly Sutton. The original work now resides in
a garden somewhere in Tokyo, fittingly owned by one of the tree leaping Japanese
actresses who appeared in the movie Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon.
Given the long historic association
of art and gardens, it would almost seem that a garden is not complete without
a sculpture or piece of artwork. Ensuring each complements the other is the
challenge. Those who design both sculptures and gardens understand the
importance of scale, texture, and appropriate placement, and it’s no less
important in a home garden.
I’ve always believed a garden is a
personal space, accepting of anything the owner chooses to place
there. Garden
gnomes, super heroes, well-dressed mannequins and even the many nefarious Lord
of the Rings characters have all found a place in gardens. A monstrous orc,
however, would be more suited to a huge gothic garden rather than lurching out
of a flowerbed, unless, of course, it happens to frighten rabbits.
Besides these outliers an endless supply
of decorative, often beautiful accoutrements awaits the browser at every garden
show and gift store where there’s something to suit anyone’s taste. Smaller
items are useful for punctuating an entrance or creating particular interest
within a planting, but too many are . . . well, too many.
Plonk something in the middle of the
front yard, though, and it’s on public display. That group of fake deer on a
country property viewed through a morning mist can for a moment be delightful —
or induce a moment of panic, but in the harsh light of midday . . . well,
they’re still plastic deer. And massive concrete lions rampant at the foot of a
suburban driveway somehow don’t capture the essence of the veldt — they’d be
far more effective lurking in the shrubbery.
Many an expanse of green lawn does
indeed cry out for a focal point, yet it is so worthwhile to reflect on those
masters of design when choosing a sculpture and the way they considered theme,
scale, location — and the garden. The appropriately placed classical statue
awaiting discovery at a random turn in the garden will gently delight the
unwary visitor.
A graceful Aphrodite, framed
naturally in an arch of trees can be perfect. Position her at distance point to
become a silhouette at sunset or sunrise and the effect is magical. When a
piece such as this has attained an ancient, mossy patina, and is revealed only
when a breeze stirs foliage, it becomes an enchanting dreamscape, and sometimes
startling part of the garden.